How the Military Shapes Dictatorships
نویسنده
چکیده
1 How the Military Shapes Dictatorships 1 Barbara Geddes UCLA All governments depend for their survival on the cooperation of the military. Although democratic regimes in industrialized countries have developed formulas for insulating most aspects of government from military influence, finding ways to insure the support of the armed forces has challenged both democratic and authoritarian governments in less industrialized and newer nations. Governments begun without organized mass citizen support have been especially vulnerable to overthrow by the military. Sixty-seven countries with population above a million achieved independence between the end of World War II and 1989. Around the time of independence, 58 percent of them held multiparty elections and, despite some shortcomings in the quality of democracy, observers expected them to be more-or-less democratic. Twenty-two percent were single-party dictatorships, and 19 percent were monarchies, most of which owed their existence to colonial powers. 2 Within twenty years of independence, 56 percent of the multiparty regimes had been overthrown by military coups. In most of the rest, ruling parties had suppressed the opposition to become dominant-or single-party autocracies. Only five of the initial 39 multiparty regimes had become stable democracies. The monarchies were similarly fragile; 54 percent were overthrown by force of arms within 1 My thanks to Sarah Leary for thoughtful and conscientious research assistance on this paper. 2 Calculated from the CIA World Factbook (2009). All countries that achieved independence after 1989 did so by seceding from existing countries. In contrast, the countries that became independent from 1946 to 1989 had previously been colonies or protectorates of richer countries. Many had not been states prior to colonization. Military interventions have occurred less often in the states formed since 1989. 2 20 years. Governments that began with single-party rule proved the most resilient with an overthrow rate of 31 percent. 3 Many of these initial coups were followed by later coups and other forms of armed intervention as time passed. In short, military forces have ousted many governments and governed many nations during the past 60 years. Yet we have little systematic knowledge about their decision-making processes. Scholars have delved deeply into the grievances that motivate military seizures of power and also into how military regimes collapse, but much less effort has gone into systematic explanations of how decisions are made to intervene and what they do while they remain in power. 4 In this paper, I investigate military …
منابع مشابه
Theories of Dictatorships: Reviewing the Literature
Despite the third wave of democratization, dictatorships are still widespread global phenomena. However, in comparative research they are often treated merely as theoretical anomalies and empirical residual categories. By addressing this shortcoming, this research has three overall ambitions which are reached by reviewing, compiling and analyzing earlier research. First, different perspectives ...
متن کاملAre Military Regimes Really Belligerent?
Does military rule make a state more belligerent internationally? Several studies have recently established that military autocracies are more likely than civilian autocracies to deploy and use military force in pursuit of foreign policy objectives. I argue that military regimes are more likely to resort to military force because they are located in more hostile security environments, and not b...
متن کاملInstitutions of the Offensive : Domestic Sources of Dispute Initiation in Authoritarian Regimes , 1950 – 1992
What are the most important sources of institutional variation among authoritarian regimes, and how do such institutions influence these dictatorships’ propensity to initiate military disputes? This article argues that most existing studies in both comparative politics and international relations employ a flawed conceptualization of authoritarian institutions. Excessive focus on the personaliza...
متن کاملDemocracy or Dictatorship: The Effect of Political Regime Type on Economic Institutions
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of political regime types, including democracy and dictatorship, on the quality of economic institutions as the main variables in the formation of the economic growth process. The political power is distributed among a wide range of interest groups in mature democracies, while it is concentrated in the hands of the elected executive in init...
متن کاملTheories of Dictatorships: Sub-Types and Explanations
Despite the third wave of democratisation, dictatorships are still a widespread global phenomenon. In recent years, comparative scholars have shown a renewed interest in such regimes, which has resulted in a significant increase in the volume of research that has been produced. However, such research is not always carried out in a cumulative fashion and, therefore, lacks the traits of a more ho...
متن کامل